The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) published a consultation paper in October 2022 (Consultation Paper) in which it proposes an approach to regulating stablecoins and related activities under the Payment Services Act 2019 (PS Act). MAS’s proposed approach centers on robust regulation of a narrow category of stablecoins that MAS hopes will then serve as “credible and reliable” mediums of exchange for Singapore’s digital asset ecosystem.
The consultation paper, Proposed Regulatory Approach for Stablecoin-Related Activities (P009-2022, 26 October 2022), seeks public comment until 21 December 2022, after which MAS intends to finalise its regulatory approach. MAS will then separately consult on the new regulations and changes to existing legislation necessary to implement its regulatory approach.
The PS Act does not define or distinguish stablecoins from other digital tokens within its scope. MAS clarified in its March 2022 update to the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Payment Services Act (PS Act) that SCS will be regulated as digital payment tokens (DPTs) under the PS Act (assuming they have all the characteristics set out in the definition of DPT in the PS Act). MAS explained that stablecoins will not be regulated as e-money (a defining characteristic of which includes being pegged to a currency) because their exchange rate relative to the pegged currency may vary when they are traded on third-party cryptocurrency exchanges and because holders may use SCS without having a relationship with the issuer. MAS reiterates that view in the Consultation Paper.
In MAS’s view, the values of stablecoins available today are too volatile to serve as credible and reliable mediums of exchange. MAS’s ultimate objective is therefore to regulate SCS in a manner that achieves a high degree of value stability. MAS further frames its proposed regulatory approach with three guiding objectives:
a. Support the development of value-adding payment use cases for stablecoins, and anchor strong stablecoin issuers as utility service providers for the digital asset ecosystem.
b. Adopt a progressive regulatory approach that is fit for purpose and provides for stepping up of measures as needed.
c. Maintain an open regime to accommodate different forms of stablecoins, including bank-issued ones.
The PS Act does not presently regulate licensees for the value stability of stablecoins they may issue. Under the proposed approach, a “stablecoin issuance service” would become a new service regulated under the PS Act, similar to the digital payment token service, e‑money issuance service and other services currently regulated under the PS Act. Also, a new class of digital token, yet to benamed (MAS suggested “regulated stablecoin”, “qualifying stablecoin” or “securely-backed stablecoin”; we will call them “MAS-regulated stablecoins” or “MRS” in this article), would be created to represent the stablecoins issued by providers of the stablecoin issuance service.
Classes of Stablecoin Issuance Service Licensees
Stablecoin issuance service licensees can be separated into four classes:
By default, non-banks that issue MRS with a total circulation equal to or less than S$5 million will not be regulated as stablecoin issuance service providers, but their stablecoins will then be classified as DPTs and not as MRS. Those issuers would be regulated as DPT service providers only if they otherwise qualify as DPT service providers.
Regulation of Non-Banks That Issue MRS
Non-banks that issue MRS will be regulated as follows:
Regulation of Banks That Issue MRS Backed by a Segregated Pool of Qualifying Reserve Assets
Banks that issue MRS backed by a segregated pool of qualifying reserve assets will be subject to the same requirements as non-banks set out above, except for the base capital, liquid asset holding and business restriction requirements in the last three bullets.
Regulation of Banks That Issue MRS Backed by Liabilities on Their Balance Sheets
Banks that issue MRS backed by liabilities on their balance sheets will only be required to comply with the timely redemption at par and disclosure requirements set out for non-banks above.
It is possible that SCS issued in Singapore are fungible with SCS issued in other jurisdictions, whether through an arrangement among independent companies or by affiliated members of a global group. In that case, MAS will only recognise the SCS issued in Singapore as MRS if the Singapore issuer is able to submit an independent attestation that the other SCS issuers meet equivalent standards regarding reserve backing and prudential requirements or if MAS is able to establish cooperative relationships with the relevant regulatory bodies in the other jurisdictions. If neither of those conditions can be satisfied, the SCS issued in Singapore will not qualify as MRS and the Singapore issuer will not qualify for a stablecoin issuance service licence.
MAS proposes to regulate MRS activities other than issuance as if the MRS were DPTs. However, DPT service providers licensed under the PS Act and dealing with MRS will be subject to the following additional requirements:
MAS proposes to supervise stablecoin arrangements as “payment systems” under the PS Act. If MAS deems the arrangement to be systemic—that is, its failure could disrupt Singapore’s financial system or cause the loss of public confidence in Singapore’s financial system—MAS could designate the stablecoin arrangement as a “designated payment system” under the PS Act, resulting in more stringent regulation under the PS Act and other financial services legislation. MAS notes that no current stablecoin arrangement in Singapore is likely to qualify as systemic.
MAS proposes a regulatory approach intended to spur the creation of anew class of stablecoins with a high degree of value stability that will serve as “credible and reliable” mediums of exchange in Singapore’s digital asset ecosystem. The new MAS-regulated stablecoins would be issued by stablecoin issuance service providers licensed under the PS Act and subject to robust financial, operational and prudential regulations. MAS seeks public comment on its proposals, after which it will finalise its regulatory approach and then adopt regulations and changes to the PS Act to implement its approach.
OrionW regularly advises clients on FinTech matters. For more information about the regulation of stablecoins in Singapore, or if you have questions about this article or other FinTech matters, please contact us at fintech@orionw.com.
Disclaimer: This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice.